Did Alabama hostage crisis’ location result in less media coverage?

The Alabama hostage crisis, in which a six-year-old boy was held captive underground, came to an end on February 5, 2013 after nearly a week of attempts to save him and capture the man who had kidnapped him. The story certainly caught the attention of the entire nation. Yet still, many have argued that the crisis’ relatively unknown location of Midland, Alabama resulted in significantly less media coverage.

Chicago Sun-Times digital editor Marcus Gilmer has argued that had the hostage taken place in a large city such as New York or Dallas, the story would dominate the headlines and media coverage would be rapid and constant. Gilmer noted that while the Midland City hostage crisis “saw a bump in readership” on the website, the story still lagged in comparison with other less significant stories. As for his explanation as to why this was the case, Gilmer responded by acknowledging that a violence-filled city like Chicago was simply not interested in hearing about “some crazy redneck with a shotgun in some podunk Alabama town.”

There are some reasonable explanations as to why else the Alabama hostage crisis received less coverage. Because the kidnapper did possess a television in his underground bunker and was actively monitoring the news, police officials and authorities requested local media outlets to remain conservative in their coverage in an effort to avoid escalation. Yet perhaps the biggest reason is because of the obscure location; with less journalists and news stations in Alabama, less coverage is inevitable simply because reporters are not there to witness the situation firsthand.

With the obscure location of the hostage crisis resulting in significantly less media coverage, one could come to the reasonable conclusion that similar situations across the United States (and the world) are receiving less coverage and thus not capturing the attention of the public. Is this disparity in coverage bias by the media, or is it simply inevitable? More importantly, is this disparity a failure on the part of the media to shed light on all news stories?

One Comment on “Did Alabama hostage crisis’ location result in less media coverage?”

  1. diduate6 says:

    Funny thing is, I read the New York times, and I didn’t know anything about this. Not one person is ever more significant to life than any other, but the sad reality of the media is that we are biased to what is more relevant to greater populations. On the other hand, my Journalism professor,tells me that the best stories either come from big cities, or the smallest of small town (places no one would dare think to go/visit). It is simply more difficult to cover a story that affects one person rather than many, because readers assume they have enough problems to worry about. Ideally it is the journalist’s duty to appropriately cover all news effectively.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s